2.1.6 Labels
Although we have been labelling phrases with the symbol P, not all phrases are equivalent to each other. This is best seen in terms of the distributions of phrases. Take, for example the two phrases in (16) the postwoman and the doctor. These look very similar, both consisting of a determiner followed by a noun. They also have the same distribution patterns, as shown by the fact that wherever we can put one of them we will also be able to put the other:
(32) | a | [the doctor] pestered [the postwoman] |
b | I saw [the doctor]/[the postwoman] | |
c | they hid from [the doctor]/[the postwoman] |
As these phrases have the same distributions, we can assume that they are phrases of the same kind. However, not all phrases distribute in the same way. Consider the phrase on his birthday. This cannot go in the same places as those in (32):
(33) | a | *[on his birthday] pestered [the postwoman] |
b | *I saw [on his birthday] | |
c | *they hid from [on his birthday] |
Clearly this phrase must be different from the previous two. We will see in the next chapter that the identity of a phrase is determined by one of the words it contains. This word is known as the head of the phrase. It will be argued later on in this book that the head of phrases such as the postwoman is the determiner and the head of phrases such as on his birthday is the preposition. Thus, we distinguish between determiner phrases (DPs) and preposition phrases (PPs).
There are also other phrases associated with the verb (VPs), with adjectives (APs) and indeed with every kind of word category that we have discussed (noun phrases – NPs, inflectional phrases – IPs, CPs and degree adverb phrases – DegPs).
For now, the main point is that there are different kinds of phrases and these have different positions within the structure of the sentence and hence different distributions. We might therefore represent the sentence in (31) more fully as:
(34) |
We will not develop this any further at this point, and we will see that certain aspects of this structure are in need of revision. But the arguments for these developments will be given in subsequent chapters.